İbn Haldun Üniversitesi
TR EN
RAHMİ ORUÇ
ARAŞTIRMA GÖREVLİSİ
  • Bildiriler

  • Uluslararası |
    The Role of Normative-Descriptive Dichotomy in Argumentation Ethics: The Case of Pragma-Dialectics and Ādāb al-Baḥth wa’l-Munāẓara

    Yayın Tarihi: - Güncelleme Tarihi: 2020-09-02 19:16:22 - Dil: İngilizce Aktif
  • Uluslararası |
    Assessing dialogical processes and the virtuous exchange of argumentative moves

    Yayın Tarihi: - Güncelleme Tarihi: 2020-09-02 19:10:20 - Dil: İngilizce Aktif
  • Ulusal |
    How to Argue Virtuously: Munāẓara

    Yayın Tarihi: - Güncelleme Tarihi: 2020-05-24 18:10:46 - Dil: İngilizce Aktif
  • Ulusal |
    From Logic to Argumentation

    Yayın Tarihi: - Güncelleme Tarihi: 2019-12-26 14:12:43 - Dil: Türkçe Aktif
  • Uluslararası |
    Is there really a ”problem of authencity of Islamicate Dialectics?

    Yayın Tarihi: - Güncelleme Tarihi: 2019-12-26 14:12:28 - Dil: İngilizce Aktif
  • Uluslararası |
    When does a Münazara End

    Yayın Tarihi: - Güncelleme Tarihi: 2022-01-11 14:02:30 - Dil: İngilizce Aktif
  • Uluslararası |
    Between Efficiency and Cooperation: the Debate on the Moves of the Antagonist in Post-classical Muslim Argumentation Literature

    Yayın Tarihi: - Güncelleme Tarihi: 2022-01-11 13:57:03 - Dil: İngilizce Aktif
  • Akademik Görevler

  • İNSAN VE TOPLUM BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ |
    KARŞILAŞTIRMALI EDEBİYAT BÖLÜMÜ |
    İBN HALDUN ÜNİVERSİTESİ

    Başlangıç Tarihi: 2018 - Bitiş Tarihi:
  • Dersler

  • Lisans |
    The World Through Art and Literature I

    Dönem: 2018-2019 - Saat: 1 - Dil: İngilizce
  • Eğitim Bilgisi

  • Doktora |
    İBN HALDUN ÜNİVERSİTESİ |
    MEDENİYETLER İTTİFAKI ENSTİTÜSÜ/MEDENİYET ARAŞTIRMALARI (DR)/

    Adı: Truth and Self in Argumentation: Pragma-Dialectics and Münazara - Başlangıç Tarihi: 2015 - Bitiş Tarihi: 2018
  • Yüksek Lisans |
    İSTANBUL BİLGİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ |
    SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ/FELSEFE VE TOPLUMSAL DÜŞÜNCE (YL) (TEZLİ)/

    Adı: Sokratik temsil: Platon’xxun Mimesis eleştirisi - Başlangıç Tarihi: 2012 - Bitiş Tarihi: 2014
  • Lisans |
    İSTANBUL BİLGİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ |
    FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ/KARŞILAŞTIRMALI EDEBİYAT BÖLÜMÜ/KARŞILAŞTIRMALI EDEBİYAT PR. (İNGİLİZCE) (TAM BURSLU)/

    Adı: - Başlangıç Tarihi: 2008 - Bitiş Tarihi: 2012
  • Temel Bilgiler

  • Karşılaştırmalı Edebiyat |
    Filoloji Temel Alanı

    Güncelleme Tarihi: 2018-12-26 11:54:03
  • Projeler

  • ARAŞTIRMA PROJESİ |
    Young people’s COVID-19 narratives from an argumentative perspective |
    The understanding accumulated in centuries concerning the analysis and appraisal of argumentation today constitutes a robust framework with a variety of approaches. Most of these approaches are normative, that is, they are equipped with templates and ideal models of inference and interaction. However, everyday discourse and communication does not follow the established (i.e., inductive, rational) argumentative structures and syllogisms. Rather, public discourse consists largely in stories, experiences, and gossip – e.g., narratives, public, ‘naqlī’ knowledge. Therefore, any argument perspective with relevance to society should address the link between rational faculties and the collective reservoir of ideas replete with meaning, memories, and stories. This linkage is particularly important for ArguMunazara. While most approaches to argumentation focus prımarıly on externalized commitments, inferential steps, types of inference, and argument delivery, ArguMunazara adopts an ethical approach to argument, taking into account the product, the process and the agent of argumentation in a multiplex manner. This means to extend the analytical focus from people’s utterances to their stories. Causing widespread uncertainty and despair, the COVID-19 pandemic has personal, social and institutional implications. Its unexpected emergence and continuing impact still loom over the public space. COVID-19 has both multiplied the uncertainties and risks in our daily lives, and reminded the finite human individual of his/her vulnerability. To make sense of the risks, citizens normally rely on scientific understanding that originates in respected health institutions, mediated by numerous sources. In the unavailability of demonstrative scientific knowledge to steer sense-making and coping mechanisms, narratives provide a safe haven, albeit sometimes a conspiratorial one. Although much has been studied and written on COVID, there is a gap in the literature on the narrative and argument generating aspect of COVID-19 in the general public. More importantly, in the literature despite there are various attempts to capture the COVID reality, a focus addressing the impacts of and responses to COVID-19 with qualitative research methodologies of narrative and argumentation perspectives is missing. This preliminary study coining narrative and argumentation analysis aims to fill the gap by both conducting original empirical research, and preparing a further, large-scale, longitudinal project.

    Tarih: 21.06.2021 | Araştırmacı
  • TÜBİTAK PROJESİ |
    Ecological reasoning and decision making in innovation-oriented industry sectors at the periphery of Europe: Reconciling divergent values and interests |
    Long-term policy problems such as climate change and sustainable development are characterised not only by their controversial social consequences and relation to “the common good”, but also and especially by the epistemic and practical uncertainties involved in their formulation. These uncertainties pave the way for institutional and cultural assumptions and values to play a significant role in decision-making processes. This project aims to account for the role values play in debates and decisions of major industry actors concerning transition to a low-carbon economy. By comparing and refining the contemporary instruments of analysis to examine the ethical issues underlying the technological management of the climate system, we pursue a systematic assessment of the cultural, political and practical aspects of the patterns of reasoning employed by the major actors of the mentioned transition. The practical implication consists of a series of viable proposals that could enhance communication and collaboration across disciplinary, cultural and sectoral boundaries.

    Tarih: 04.12.2017 | Bursiyer
  • Diğer (Uluslararası) |
    ADAB IN DIALOGUE: DEVELOPING ARGUMENTATIVE VIRTUES IN A DIVIDED WORLD |
    Münazara modeli geliştirme

    Tarih: 01.05.2022 | Proje Koordinatör Yrd.
  • Üyelikler

  • Yönetim Kurulu Üyesi |
    Bilimsel Kuruluş

    Başlangıç Tarihi: 2021 - Bitiş Tarihi: - Durum: Aktif
  • Makaleler

  • ULUSLARARASI |
    Hakemli |
    Uses, Motives, Functions, and Virtues of Silence in Argumentation in Light of Jadal and Ādāb al-Baḥth wa al-Munāẓarah

    Yıl: 2021 - Yazar Sayısı: 1 - İndeks: SCOPUS